1 Hour / 1 CE

On Demand | Self-Paced Professional Training

This on-demand professional training program on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and Competency to Stand Trial (CST): A Review for Forensic Evaluators is presented by Jerrod Brown, Ph.D. & Patricia A. Zapf, Ph.D.

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a permanent disorder caused by prenatal exposure to alcohol. FASD encompasses a range of symptoms, including cognitive (e.g., intelligence, executive control, and memory), social (e.g., communication skills and suggestibility), and adaptive (e.g., decision-making ability and capacity to solve problems) impairments. In combination with co-occurring disorders (e.g., ADHD, depression, anxiety, and substance use), the identification and assessment of FASD can become a complicated endeavor. To help address these complexities, Neurodevelopmental Disorder Associated with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (ND-PAE) was identified as a disorder for future study in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5th Edition (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Nonetheless, many cases of FASD still go unidentified, which is particularly problematic because the disorder increases the likelihood of involvement in the criminal justice system. Further, the symptoms of FASD make it more difficult for an individual to participate in the criminal justice system (i.e., waive rights, enter pleas, stand trial, and abide by community supervision).

Despite limited empirical evidence, it is likely that FASD causes deficits in an individual’s abilities relevant to competence to stand trial (CST). CST refers to a defendant’s capacity to comprehend legal proceedings, make informed legal decisions, serve as a witness, behave in the manner dictated by the court, accurately complete legal paperwork, and contribute to the development of one’s legal defense. Decisions of competency are ultimately made by judges in most jurisdictions. These decisions are made in light of evidence gathered in CST evaluations, which are typically conducted by a psychologist or psychiatrist. These evaluations often include the administration of several validated instruments that assess a range of constructs, including cognitive abilities and functioning, psychopathology, and knowledge of the legal system.

The cognitive and social deficits of FASD can complicate the validity of CST evaluations in several ways. First, individuals with FASD often can display average to good verbal skills, which may mask their true developmental level. This highlights the importance of relying on a developmentally sensitive approach when conducting CST evaluations. Second, the combination of deficits in memory and proneness to social pressure might predispose defendants with FASD to suggestibility and confabulation, which could contribute to inaccurate assessments as well as false confessions, false testimony, and wrongful convictions. Third, profoundly different impressions of a defendant may be garnered by simply using different styles of interview questions. Specifically, the presence of FASD may not be detected by interviewers who rely on yes/no questions, which could help a defendant conceal these impairments. Fourth, co-occurring psychiatric disorders and other impairments increase the difficulty of discerning the source of CST deficits. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of professionals who are experts in both CST evaluations and FASD.

Two conceptualizations of CST may be helpful in distinguishing the impact of FASD on CST. Bonnie’s reconceptualization of competence (1992) asserts that competency is a function of the defendant’s capacity to (a) effectively assist in their own legal defense and (b) make informed and valid legal decisions. In contrast, Grisso’s (2003) conceptual model focuses on five components of competency: (1) functional, (2) causal, (3) interactive, (4) judgmental, and (5) dispositional. In combination with the criteria for ND-PAE, these models of CST have the potential to illuminate how FASD can systematically impact different aspects of CST. Evidence of the impact of FASD on CST can be gleaned from several case law, media, and caregiver and professional examples.

The principal aim of this program is to familiarize mental health and legal professionals with FASD and its long-ranging impacts on competency to stand trial. Through a review of the current research and case law, participants are trained in four key topics. First, the program systematically describes the risk factors, red flag indicators, and symptoms of FASD. During this process, any myths and misconceptions about FASD are dispelled. Second, the program reviews major conceptualizations of CST with an eye toward better understanding the different ways that FASD can limit a defendant’s competency to stand trial. Third, the program discusses how FASD can impact CST evaluations and highlights ways by which professionals can avoid such pitfalls. Finally, we conclude with an exploration of current gaps in knowledge of FASD and CST and the identification of future research directions.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:

  • 1 Describe the risk factors, red flag indicators, and symptoms of FASD
  • 2 Describe basic understanding of the legal requirements of competency to stand trial
  • 3 Describe the process by which competency to stand trial decisions are made in the United States
  • 4 Describe the different ways that FASD can limit a defendant’s competency to stand trial
  • 5
    Describe deficits in memory and proneness to social pressure predispose defendants with FASD to suggestibility and confabulation
  • 6 Describe Bonnie’s (1992) and Grisso’s (2003) conceptualizations of competency to stand trial
  • 7
    Describe the presence of FASD has impacted CST in several case law, media, and professional case study examples
  • 8 Describe current gaps in knowledge of FASD and CST and identify future research directions
  • Intended Audience

    This training is designed for mental health and legal professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of how Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) can affect a defendant’s competency to stand trial (CST). The program covers the intersection of neurodevelopmental disorders and legal standards, equipping participants to better assess and address competency issues related to FASD in various professional settings. The content is relevant for those involved in forensic evaluation, clinical assessment, and legal decision-making, and is suitable for professionals at all stages of their careers.

  • Experience Level

    This training is applicable for all career stages: entry-level, mid-career, and experienced professionals.

  • Practice Setting

    • Mental health professionals (psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, counselors)

    • Forensic psychologists and clinical psychologists

    • Psychiatrists and mental health clinicians

    • Attorneys, judges, and legal professionals involved in CST evaluations

    • Social workers and case managers in legal or healthcare settings

    • Correctional and criminal justice professionals

    • Professionals in healthcare, social service, and educational environments who encounter CST issues

Presented By

Patricia A. Zapf, PhD

Patricia A. Zapf, Ph.D. is Vice President for Continuing & Professional Studies at Palo Alto University (PAU). Prior to coming to PAU she was a professor of psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (CUNY) for 16 years, during which time she was instrumental in the development of a new doctoral program in clinical psychology with an emphasis in forensic psychology and served as the program’s first Director of Clinical Training. Prior to her time at CUNY, she was on the psychology and law faculty at the University of Alabama. In 2009, Dr. Zapf founded CONCEPT Professional Training with the mission of elevating the level of practice in psychology and related professions.

View More Programs from this Presenter
Patricia A. Zapf, PhD

Presented By

Jerrod Brown, PhD

Jerrod Brown, PhD, is the Treatment Director for Pathways Counseling Center, Inc., the lead developer of an online Master of Arts degree in Human Services with an emphasis in Forensic Behavioral Health from Concordia University, St. Paul, Minnesota, the founder and CEO of the American Institute for the Advancement of Forensic Studies (AIAFS), and the Editor-in-Chief of Forensic Scholars Today (FST) and the Journal of Special Populations (JSP).

View More Programs from this Presenter
Jerrod Brown, PhD

Training Outline

Key topics covered in this training include:

  • Review the risk factors, red flag indicators, and symptoms of FASD


  • Reviews major conceptualizations of CST with an eye towards better understanding the different ways that FASD can limit a defendant’s competency to stand trial

  • Discusses how FASD can impact CST evaluations and highlight ways by which professionals can avoid such pitfalls

  • Review of current gaps in knowledge of FASD and CST and the identification of future research directions

CE Sponsorship Information

Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here. 

  1. American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.

  2. Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.

  3. Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.

  4. National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).



Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356 and the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6811. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. CONCEPT Professional Training, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. CONCEPT Professional Training maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period: 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits.