Confabulation and Suggestibility: Clinical, Forensic, and Judicial Considerations
Presented by Jerrod Brown, PhD
This webinar on Confabulation and Suggestibility: Clinical, Forensic, and Judicial Considerations is presented by Jerrod Brown. PhD.
In this webinar, participants learn about confabulation and suggestibility within clinical, forensic, and judicial settings through a review of relevant research findings, case law, and clinical case studies. Specifically, the webinar focuses on the impact of confabulation and suggestibility on mental health assessment and treatment completion, arrest and arraignment, false confessions, testimony, competency to stand trial, and other aspects of the criminal justice system process. This includes an overview of the roles of confabulation and suggestibility in an interview and interrogative settings. Participants can expect to better understand the contributing factors, red flag indicators, and controversies and misconceptions of confabulation and suggestibility. The webinar concludes with a discussion of the potential benefits of routine screening for confabulation and suggestibility among clinical and forensic populations.
Upon completion of this webinar you will be able to:
Describe key research findings, statistics, and concepts associated with confabulation and suggestibility
Describe a basic understanding of confabulation and suggestibility within clinical, forensic, and judicial settings
Describe the concepts of confabulation, and suggestibility
Describe the challenges that confabulation and suggestibility can present for clinical and forensic professionals
Describe basic knowledge of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS)
Describe the topic of interrogative suggestibility and confabulation within interrogation settings
Describe the controversies and misconceptions associated with confabulation and suggestibility
Custom training options for groups of 5 to 500+