Utah DHS - Evaluating Juveniles for Competency to Proceed in Delinquency Matters

This training begins with the legal concepts and foundations of competency to proceed in juvenile court and ends with training around report writing and providing effective courtroom testimony. In between, participants will walk through the literature and procedures necessary to conduct effective and developmentally-sensitive evaluations of juveniles facing adjudication in Utah's juvenile courts.
Upon completion of this course you will be able to:
Describe the best practices in conducting juvenile adjudicative competence evaluations & Legal Standards
Describe forensic concepts, and models for thinking about juvenile adjudicative competence
Describe the body of empirical research related to the issue of juvenile adjudicative competence
Describe the role of normal childhood development in conducting developmentally sensitive juvenile adjudicative competence evaluations
Describe the role of developmental psychopathology in conducting developmentally sensitive juvenile adjudicative competence evaluations
Describe key elements in conducting a developmentally sensitive competence interview of a juvenile
Describe the strengths of using various Forensic Assessment Instruments in the evaluation of juvenile adjudicative competence
Describe the weaknesses of using various Forensic Assessment Instruments in the evaluation of juvenile adjudicative competence
Describe the steps in forming opinions relevant to juvenile adjudicative competence
Describe the key elements of a juvenile adjudicative competence report that meets best practice standards & the current approaches to remediating incompetence with juveniles
Overview
Lesson 1 Video
Lesson 1 Quiz
Lesson 2 Video
Worksheet for Developmentally Appropriate Interviewing
Submit your completed worksheet here
Lesson 2 Quiz
Lesson 3 Video
Sample Case 1 - Evaluation Report - Referral & Evaluation Procedures
Lesson 3 Quiz
Lesson 4 Video
Lesson 4 Quiz
Lesson 5 Video
Blank JACI Protocol Form
JACI Role-Play Case Reference
Lesson 5 Quiz
Dr. Ivan Kruh
Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. PaloAlto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies(CONCEPT) is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies(CONCEPT), SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Boardfor Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers#SW-0356 and the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental HealthPractitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental healthcounselors. #MHC-0073. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT)has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6811. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. CONCEPT ProfessionalTraining, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. CONCEPT Professional Training maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period: 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits.