Live Virtual Training via Zoom

David M. Corey, PhD, ABPP, Mary Comperini, PsyD, CCHP, ABPP, Carrie Kennedy, PhD, ABPP, and Philip Trompetter, PhD, ABPP, present a live virtual professional training program on Navigating the Law in Police & Public Safety Psychology: What’s Changed Since 2012 in partnership with the American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPPSP).

The legal landscape governing police and public safety psychology has changed substantially since the original Core Legal Knowledge document was published in 2012. Courts have refined the standards for when an employer may compel a fitness-for-duty evaluation, whether by individualized referral or by categorical policy, and have reaffirmed long-standing limits on what the evaluator may disclose. They have extended professional liability and discovery exposure to preemployment evaluators and reshaped the constitutional analysis of police use of force. The litigated application of statutes such as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act has also sharpened the boundaries of permissible inquiry in employment evaluations. During the same period, ABPPSP broadened its definition of the specialty to encompass military, aviation, and national security psychology, and the revised resource adds the authorities that govern practice in both areas, including military confidentiality, command notification, the military psychotherapist-patient privilege, and the national security adjudicative guidelines. This four-hour interactive workshop introduces the newly revised Core Legal Knowledge resource, an update to the 2012 document prepared by experienced public safety psychologists. 

Participants will receive a substantive update on these developments and will learn a practical method for locating and applying governing legal authority with the resource’s searchable companion file. The workshop is organized around the four functions of daily practice: preemployment screening, fitness-for-duty evaluation, treatment and confidentiality, and organizational consultation across the specialty’s expanded population contexts. Each content block concludes with a realistic practice scenario, written in two tiers of difficulty and resolved with the resource, so that the workshop serves participants ranging from graduate students to board-certified specialists.

This program is intended for police and public safety psychologists at every stage of professional development: graduate students preparing for careers in the specialty, early-career psychologists building a framework for legally informed practice, candidates preparing for ABPPSP board certification, experienced practitioners updating their knowledge of legal developments since 2012, and board-certified specialists seeking a practical method for applying legal authority and researching legal questions in diverse public safety settings.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:

  • 1 Describe the major legal developments that have altered the psycholegal context of public safety assessment, treatment, and consultation since publication of the original Core Legal Knowledge document in 2012, and distinguish new legal authority from established authority newly incorporated as the scope of the specialty has expanded.
  • 2 Describe among constitutional provisions, statutes, regulations, case law, and professional standards; explain the hierarchy of legal authority; and identify when a practice question is governed by authority outside the scope of the Core Legal Knowledge resource, such as state statutes and regulations, signaling the need for jurisdiction-specific legal consultation.
  • 3 Describe locating governing legal authorities using the searchable Core Legal Knowledge companion resource to resolve realistic practice questions in preemployment screening, fitness-for-duty evaluation, treatment, and organizational consultation, and to support preparation for board certification in police and public safety psychology, as well as ongoing practice research.
  • 4 Describe intersecting legal authorities to complex practice scenarios, including those involving competing statutory obligations and limits on the scope of disclosure, and integrate legal authority with professional standards and sound psychological judgment.
  • Intended Audience

    This workshop is designed for individuals engaged in or preparing for roles in police and public safety psychology across a range of environments, including law enforcement, corrections, military, aviation, fire/EMS, emergency communications, and national security. Participants will benefit from a comprehensive understanding of the evolving legal landscape, practical methods for applying legal authority, and resources for addressing complex legal and ethical questions in diverse public safety contexts.

    Examples of Relevant Professionals:

    • Police Psychologist
    • Public Safety Psychologist
    • Mental Health Professional
    • Preemployment Evaluator
    • Fitness-for-Duty Evaluator
    • Organizational Consultant
    • Military Psychologist
    • Aviation Psychologist
    • National Security Psychologist
    • Corrections Psychologist
    • Fire/EMS Psychologist
    • Emergency Communications Psychologist
    • Graduate Student in Psychology
    • ABPPSP Board Certification Candidate
  • Experience Level

    This continuing education training is designed for licensed and pre-licensed mental health professionals at all stages of experience in police and public safety psychology.

    • Beginner: Graduate students or early-career professionals new to police and public safety psychology, seeking foundational knowledge of the legal landscape, core legal authorities, and practical application in preemployment screening, fitness-for-duty evaluation, treatment, and consultation.

    • Intermediate: Practitioners with some experience in public safety settings who are building a legally informed practice framework, updating their understanding of recent legal developments, and preparing for board certification.

    • Advanced: Experienced and board-certified specialists seeking to deepen their expertise, apply updated legal standards to complex scenarios, and enhance their ability to research and integrate evolving legal authority into diverse public safety contexts.

  • Practice Setting

    Professionals in police and public safety psychology practice in dynamic, high-stakes environments where they support the mental health, operational readiness, and organizational effectiveness of public safety personnel. Their work settings are often multidisciplinary, involving collaboration with law enforcement agencies, correctional institutions, military units, aviation organizations, fire/EMS departments, emergency communication centers, and national security entities. These environments require navigating complex legal, ethical, and organizational frameworks, often under conditions of confidentiality, high liability, and evolving legal standards.

    Examples of Practice Settings:

    • Police departments and law enforcement agencies
    • Correctional facilities and probation/parole offices
    • Military bases and defense organizations
    • Airports and aviation authorities
    • Fire departments and EMS agencies
    • Emergency dispatch and communication centers
    • National security and intelligence agencies
    • Governmental or private consulting firms specializing in public safety
    • Academic or training institutions preparing future professionals in the field

Training Instructors:

David M. Corey, PhD, ABPP

David M. Corey, Ph.D., ABPP, is board certified in forensic psychology and in police and public safety psychology by the American Board of Professional Psychology, and is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (Division 18). In practice since 1980, he limits his work to suitability and fitness evaluations of candidates for, and incumbents in, positions of public trust or safety, and has conducted more than 5,000 fitness evaluations and 40,000 suitability evaluations. He is the coauthor of Assessing Police and Other Public Safety Personnel With the MMPI-3 (University of Minnesota Press, 2024), Evaluations of Police Suitability and Fitness for Duty (Oxford University Press, 2020), the California POST Psychological Screening Manual (2024), a series of evidence-based MMPI-3 and MPQ interpretive reports for public safety selection, and the Personal History Survey, along with more than 40 other peer-reviewed publications. He is the founding president of the American Board of Police & Public Safety Psychology and chair of the Specialty Council for Police & Public Safety Psychology. He is licensed in eight U.S. states and the Republic of Ireland.

Philip Trompetter, PhD, ABPP

Dr. Phil Trompetter is a California-licensed clinical psychologist with nearly fifty years of experience in police and forensic psychology. He is board-certified by the American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPPSP) through the American Board of Professional Psychology and served as president of ABPPSP from 2016 to 2017.

Mary Comperini, Psy.D., CCHP, ABPP

Dr. Mary Comperini has served in California’s state system since 2009, bringing more than 16 years of experience in forensic and correctional psychology. Her career has included work with some of the state’s most high-risk populations, beginning at Porterville Developmental Center’s Secured Treatment Center, and later contributing to the activation of the California Health Care Facility (CHCF) in Stockton. In 2015, she joined the California Men’s Colony, where she has advanced through multiple leadership roles, including Senior Psychologist Supervisor, Chief of Mental Health, and a temporary assignment as Chief Executive Officer.

Dr. Comperini earned her Doctorate and Master’s degrees in Clinical Psychology, as well as a Post-Doctorate Certificate in Forensic Psychology, from Argosy University in Schaumburg, Illinois. She also holds a Master’s degree in Education with an emphasis in Community Counseling, and a Bachelor’s degree in Communications with a focus on theatre arts, both from the University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh.

She is board certified in Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPP) and is proud to be the first correctional psychologist to earn this certification. In addition to her clinical and leadership roles, she serves on the American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology and contributes to a subcommittee dedicated to revising certification criteria to better reflect the role of correctional psychologists. She is passionate about expanding pathways for correctional psychologists to pursue board certification, strengthening their professional identity and recognition within the broader field of public safety psychology.

Her pre-licensure training included extensive work in correctional, juvenile, and forensic settings across Wisconsin, Illinois, and California. She has provided subject matter expert testimony in California courts and has chaired or co-chaired numerous professional committees, including the Competency Evaluation Standards Subcommittee at Porterville Developmental Center, the Psychology Ethics Subcommittee, and the Behavior Management Plan Review Committee at CHCF. She also represented Mental Health on CHCF’s Medical Ethics Committee and currently serves on the Use of Force Executive Review Panel at the California Men’s Colony.

In addition to her professional accomplishments, Dr. Comperini integrates her lifelong passion for theatre and music into her work and personal life. She has witnessed firsthand the transformative power of the creative arts in fostering healing, resilience, and expression—particularly for individuals coping with grief and trauma within correctional environments. Music, in particular, provides her with both balance and a creative outlet, which she considers an essential source of resilience and renewal. She also encourages staff to engage in their own acts of renewal and self-care, recognizing that sustaining well-being is vital to the demanding work of correctional and public safety psychology.

Carrie Kennedy, PhD, ABPP (Clinical; Police and Public Safety)

Carrie H. Kennedy, Ph.D., ABPP, is a neuropsychologist with specialization in military psychology and aeromedical psychology.

An active-duty captain in the U.S. Navy, she has served for 27 years. Assignments have included overseas service, deployment to a combat zone, and clinical, embedded, and operational positions. She currently serves as Lead, Naval Air Training Human Performance Team.

She is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia, a Fellow of both the American Psychological Association (APA) and the National Academy of Neuropsychology, and currently serves as APA Division 19, Society for Military Psychology President and Member-at-Large, American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology. Awards include the APA Division 19 Charles S. Gersoni, Robert S. Nichols, John C. Flanagan, and Distinguished Mentor Awards, and she is a two-time Navy Psychologist of the Year winner.

Dr. Kennedy is board certified in both Clinical and Police and Public Safety Psychology.

Training Outline
Key Topics Covered in this Training Include:

    • The changed landscape since 2012: from a primarily police psychology specialty with paper records and local practice to a broad public safety specialty encompassing corrections, military, aviation, fire/EMS, emergency communications, and national security, with electronic records, interstate and telehealth practice, heightened forensic expectations, and more sophisticated employment law
    • Why the document required revision and how it was rebuilt, from a survey-derived consensus list of citations to a committee-curated resource with structured summaries, relevance-to-practice narratives, population contexts, and a searchable companion file (brief)
    • The hierarchy of legal authority: how constitutional provisions, statutes, regulations, case law, and professional standards each inform practice, and which controls when they conflict
    • What the resource deliberately excludes (state law and other jurisdiction-specific authority) and why recognizing that boundary is itself a legal literacy skill
    • Orientation to the revised document and the searchable companion resource: service categories, population contexts, and search strategy. The tool reappears throughout the workshop as the means of resolving each scenario.
  • •  Individualized assessment requirements and the limits of categorical disqualification

    • Evaluator liability: the extension of professional duty and malpractice principles to preemployment evaluators

    • Permissible inquiry under the ADA, the ADA Amendments Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act: what may be asked, when, and of whom

    • Discoverability of screening records and the evaluator’s documentation practices

    Tiered scenario: The Disqualified Candidate. In the threshold tier, a conditional-offer candidate discloses a family history of psychiatric illness during the evaluation. May the evaluator inquire further, and may the information inform the suitability determination? In the escalation tier, the agency requests the full evaluation report including the family history; the candidate is later screened out, requests his records, and retains counsel. Participants sequence the evaluator’s obligations under GINA’s acquisition and disclosure rules, ADA confidentiality provisions, and documentation and disclosure-scope standards, resolving the scenario with the companion resource.

    •  The business necessity standard: what does and does not justify compelling an FFDE, including the insufficiency of unverified or anonymous allegations, the risk of retaliatory referral, and the application of the standard to categorical examination policies such as annual or automatic post-leave examinations
    • The scope of disclosure: what the evaluator may report to the referring agency
    • Evaluee access to assessment data and due process considerations
    • The intersection of FFDE authority with FMLA return-to-work provisions, USERRA protections for returning service members, and compelled-statement doctrine
    • Tiered scenario: The Returning Officer. In the threshold tier, an officer is referred for an FFDE after several angry confrontations with citizens. What authority governs whether the referral is lawful, and what is the permissible scope of the evaluation and report? In the escalation tier, the officer has recently returned from military deployment and FMLA leave, and during the evaluation he discloses conduct that could constitute a criminal offense. Participants sequence the evaluator’s obligations under the ADA’s business necessity and disclosure limits, FMLA and USERRA constraints on return-to-work examinations, and the compelled-statement protections of Garrity and its progeny, using the companion resource.
    • Privilege and confidentiality: Jaffee, psychotherapy notes, and the distinction between treatment records and therapy notes under HIPAA
    • The duty to protect and its variations: what Tarasoff does and does not require, and why the duty is jurisdiction-specific
    • Employer demands for treatment information: what a treating psychologist may release, to whom, and on what authorization
    • Military practice: the HIPAA military command exception, DoD notification instructions, and the military psychotherapist-patient privilege
    • Tiered scenario: The Fighter Pilot. In the threshold tier, an Air Force pilot in confidential treatment for escalating panic attacks during flight asks the psychologist not to notify his commander. What are the psychologist’s confidentiality obligations, and how does military practice differ from civilian practice? In the escalation tier, the pilot’s condition deteriorates, command initiates an administrative action, and the government seeks the treatment records. Participants work through the military command exception, the applicable DoD instructions, and the scope and exceptions of the military privilege, using the companion resource.
    • Constitutional standards for correctional mental health care: deliberate indifference, its objective and subjective components, and the difference between malpractice and a constitutional violation
    • Involuntary treatment: the distinct legal frameworks governing medication for dangerousness and for competency restoration
    •  Use-of-force analysis after recent Supreme Court precedent, and the consulting psychologist’s role in policy, training, and post-incident review
    • Organizational consultation and municipal liability: failure-to-train and failure-to-screen theories
    • Tiered scenario: The Suicidal Inmate. In the threshold tier, a correctional psychologist concludes that an inmate’s repeated suicide threats are manipulative and recommends no special precautions; the inmate dies by suicide that evening. What constitutional standard governs, and how does it differ from a negligence standard? In the escalation tier, the estate sues the psychologist, the facility, and the county. Participants analyze the deliberate indifference standard, individual and municipal liability theories, the role of professional judgment as a defense, and the expert testimony standards that will govern the litigation, using the companion resource.
    • The resource as a board certification study tool: how candidates preparing for ABPPSP board certification can organize their preparation around the service categories and population contexts, use the abbreviated summaries as entry points to the primary authorities rather than substitutes for them, and self-test by working the workshop scenarios against the document
    • The presenters’ fifteen: the fifteen authorities the presenters would rely on across a career spanning police, corrections, military, aviation, fire/EMS, emergency communications, and national security practice, offered as a study guide for candidates. Audience polls at the hardest calls, with presenter commentary on why each close call goes the way it does.
    • The resource as a practice research tool: a demonstrated workflow for experienced specialists, from an incoming referral question, to filtering the companion file by service category and population context, to the abbreviated summary, to the primary authority, including how to recognize when a question falls outside the resource and requires jurisdiction-specific research or legal consultation
    • Maintaining legal currency: how to monitor developments and how to use the resource as the law continues to evolve

Live Event Policy

Registration for our live events is covered for one (1) person per purchase. If you would like to purchase for a group, please purchase more than one registration for this event.

  • Event Communications

    When registering, use an email that is active and that you check regularly. We are not responsible for communications not being received; if you do not add [email protected] to your email safe sender list, our emails are likely to end up in your spam or junk folders.

  • Cancellation Policy

    Have a sudden change of plans and are unable to attend live? No worries; you will be given access to the on-demand version of the program once available. Please note that if you attend live, no access to the recording will be given.

  • Event Conduct

    Professional conduct is expected during our live programs. Our goal is to make our events as interactive as possible for all participants. We reserve the right to remove any participants who are disruptive, act unprofessionally, or who we are unable to verify their purchase.

We are proud to partner with

The American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPPSP)

The American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPPSP)

We are proud to partner with The American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology (ABPPSP) for this training. ABPPSP became a fully affiliated specialty board of the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) on October 21, 2011. Police and Public Safety Psychology is concerned with assisting law enforcement and other public safety personnel and agencies in carrying out their missions and societal functions with optimal effectiveness, safety, health, and conformity to laws and ethics. It consists of the application of the science and profession of psychology in four primary domains of practice: assessment, clinical intervention, operational support, and organizational consultation.

CE Sponsorship Information

Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here. 

  1. American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.

  2. Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.

  3. Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.

  4. National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).


Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 7190. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. Palo Alto University, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. Palo Alto University maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits. Continuing and Professional Studies, Palo Alto University, is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0103. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is solely responsible for all aspects of the programs. Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies, is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073.