Insanity Evaluations: Advanced Applications
Presented by: Robert A. Schug, Ph.D.

This on-demand professional training program on Insanity Evaluations: Advanced Applications is presented by Robert A. Schug, PhD.
This program is designed for experienced (advanced-level) forensic psychologists and psychiatrists who specialize in conducting court-appointed insanity evaluations. It is also suitable for other mental health professionals interested in insanity assessment, provided they have some prior experience in this field.
The psycho-legal question of insanity is one of the most challenging to address in forensic assessment, as understanding an individual’s mental state at the time of a criminal offense presents unique challenges, particularly when a period of time has passed between the offense and the evaluation.
This program presents advanced techniques and strategies in the assessment of insanity for the forensic evaluator, utilizing what the presenter refers to as a “researcher mentality.” Three primary sources of evaluation data are discussed, with an emphasis on psychological testing and less conventional, more “out-of-the-box” sources of collateral information. Advanced data analysis and integration, case conceptualization and formulation, report writing, courtroom testimony, and other important considerations are also discussed.
Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:
Key topics covered in this training include:
Introductory Material
-Statistics re: insanity plea
-Challenges of insanity evaluations
Conceptual Issues (M’Naughten Standard)
-Nature/quality of act
-Wrongfulness
Adopting the “Researcher Mentality”
The Evaluation: Three Primary Sources of Data
-A word on evaluation data: “Garbage in, garbage out…”
-The Defendant
-Clinical interviews
-Observations
-Psychological testing
-Mental state at time of evaluation versus time of the offense
-Performance in some testing domains (IQ) may be stable and reflect functioning at time of instant offense(s)
-Applications of specific psychological tests/measures
Collateral Interviews
-Collateral interview considerations and strategies.
-Standardization of the collateral interview across interviewees.
Other Collateral Data (“The Big Three”)
-Jail medical/mental health records
-Content analysis approach and organization/representation of data
-Comparative analysis between jail calls and clinical interviews
-Creating a timeline/chronology of medical/MH record entries
-Arrest/booking: Defendant observed by officers and jailers
-Initial mental health screening in jail.
-High observation housing (HOH) records (behavioral observations documented every 15 minutes)
-Jail telephone calls
-Police body-worn camera footage
-Other sources
-Social media (defendant, family, etc.)
Report Writing
-Identifying poorly-written reports.
-“Bad” reports do not link mental state to instant offense(s)
-Producing effectively-written reports.
-References, citations, and incorporating scientific literature.
Testimony and Other Considerations
Case Example(s)
Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here.
American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.
Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.
Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.
National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).
Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356 and the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6811. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. CONCEPT Professional Training, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. CONCEPT Professional Training maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period: 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits.