AAFP: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Criminal Responsibility
Presented by Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP, in partnership with The American Academy of Forensic Psychology
This on-demand professional training program on Evidence-Based Evaluations of Criminal Responsibility is presented by Terry Kukor, Ph.D., ABPP, in partnership with The American Academy of Forensic Psychology.
This program focuses on assessing a defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense as it relates to issues of criminal responsibility (sanity). Specific topics include practical assessment of the defendant’s understanding of the nature, quality, and wrongfulness of their behavior; objective and subjective standards of moral wrongfulness; evidentiary basis for inferences about wrongfulness; amnesia and sanity; using collateral information; psychological testing in criminal responsibility evaluations; the relationship between symptoms and mental state at the time of the alleged offense; dealing with complications (e.g., denial of involvement in the alleged offense); accounting for contradictory data; formulating opinions; and malingering in criminal responsibility evaluations. A practice model for the assessment of criminal responsibility is introduced, emphasizing gathering and evaluating the evidence necessary to address the functional legal capacities in question. Practical report writing strategies are reviewed as well. Clinical cases and vignettes provide participants with valuable opportunities to apply the conceptual framework to case detail in criminal responsibility evaluations.
Upon completion of this program you will be able to:
Describe legal principles relevant to the evaluation of criminal responsibility (sanity)
Describe a conceptual framework for evaluating legal sanity
Describe questions designed to elicit “big picture” and “behavioral detail” data pertinent to evaluation of criminal responsibility evaluations
Describe examples of evidence that can be used to support an opinion about sanity
Describe effective techniques for bridging clinical and behavioral data with relevant legal principles
Describe how bias can interfere with objective consideration of diversity factors (e.g., race, culture, sexual orientation, etc.) in the evaluation of criminal responsibility
Describe the conceptual framework to forensic case examples
Review Before Proceeding
Lesson 1 Video
Intoxication and Settled Insanity—Unsettled Matters
Amphetamine-Induced Psychosis
Lesson 2 Video
Methamphetamine Psychosis: Epidemiology and Management
Methamphetamine-Induced Psychosis
Lesson 3 Video
Differentiating Substance-Induced and Primary Psychotic Disorders
Differentiating First Episode Substance Induced and Primary Psychotic Disorders
Lesson 4 Video
Jane Doe Sanity Evaluation Case Data
Lesson 5 Video
Sanity Evaluation Questions
Video Conference Forensic Evaluation (VCFE) Checklist
Notification Form for VCFE
Rights Statement for VCFE
Limitations and Caveats for VCFE
American Academy of Forensic Psychology
Custom training options for groups of 5 to 500+