Ethical and Legal Issues in Correctional Mental Health
Presented by: Virginia Barber Rioja, PhD

This on-demand professional training program on Ethical and Legal Issues in Correctional Mental Health is presented by Virginia Barber Rioja, PhD.
This badge-earning program can be shared digitally on platforms like LinkedIn or your resume and counts towards a certificate. Enroll in this program to earn credit towards the Correctional Mental Health Certificate and share your new digital credentials.
The U.S. correctional system provides significant opportunities for clinicians to contribute to the improvement of mental health care in jails and prisons. However, mental health professionals working in correctional settings are continuously exposed to complicated ethical and moral dilemmas. This is particularly true for those who see protecting the human rights of those they work with as an aim of correctional healthcare.
The unique nature of correctional settings requires psychologists to balance the well-being of their patients and the security or safety needs of the institution. Issues of confidentiality, dual loyalty, or placement of people in punitive segregation/restrictive housing are just some examples of areas of correctional practice that raise ethical dilemmas. This program provides an overview of the ethical and moral dilemmas that arise in the correctional context, it explains why professional organizations’ ethical guidelines might not be sufficient to inform correctional mental health practice, and it provides recommendations for minimizing ethical issues and protecting human rights in correctional healthcare.
Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:
Key topics covered in this training include:
                  
                  Introduction to Correctional Mental Health Care 
 -Purpose and Scope: Briefly outline the role of mental health professionals in correctional settings. 
 -Importance of Human Rights: Discuss the aim of protecting human rights within the constraints of a correctional environment.
                
                  
                   Ethical and Moral Dilemmas in Correctional Settings -Confidentiality: 
 -Challenges in maintaining confidentiality with institutional demands for information. 
 -Case studies illustrating breaches and their consequences.
                
                  
                  Ethical and Moral Dilemmas in Correctional Settings Confidentiality: 
 -Challenges in maintaining confidentiality with institutional demands for information. 
 -Case studies illustrating breaches and their consequences. 
 Dual Loyalty: 
 -Balancing the therapeutic needs of individuals with institutional security and policy. 
 -Examples of conflicts and how they impact treatment. 
 Punitive Segregation/Restrictive Housing: 
 -Ethical issues around placing individuals in isolation. 
 -Effects of isolation on mental health and strategies to address these issues.
 Informed Consent: 
 -Difficulties in obtaining truly informed consent in a coercive environment. 
 -Strategies to ensure ethical consent processes.
                
                  
                  Limitations of Professional Organizations’ Ethical Guidelines 
 General Guidelines vs. Correctional Context: 
 -Discuss how general ethical guidelines may not fully address the complexities of correctional settings. 
 -Case examples where guidelines fall short. 
 Institutional Policies: 
 -How institutional policies can conflict with professional ethical standards. 
 -Analysis of policy vs. ethical practice dilemmas.
                
                  
                  Strategies for Minimizing Ethical Issues 
 Ethical Decision-Making Models: 
 -Introduce models specifically tailored for correctional settings. 
 -Examples of how these models can be applied. 
 Institutional Advocacy: 
 -Approaches for advocating for policies that support ethical practice and human rights. 
 Training and Support: 
 -The importance of ongoing training and supervision. 
 -Creating support networks for professionals dealing with ethical dilemmas. 
 -Support groups for correctional mental health professionals.
                
        Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here.
American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.
Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.
Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.
National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).
Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356 and the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6811. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. CONCEPT Professional Training, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. CONCEPT Professional Training maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period: 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits.