Best Practices in the Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial
Presented by Patricia A. Zapf, PhD
This self-paced training program on Best Practices in the Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial is presented by Patricia A. Zapf, PhD.
One of the primary foundations of criminal law is that all defendants have a right to a fair trial. Towards this end, upwards of 60,000 evaluations of competency to stand trial are conducted annually in the USA. Research has shown that the opinion of the evaluator in these evaluations is accepted by the courts upwards of 95% of the time. Thus, it is imperative that these evaluations be conducted using best practices. Two important sources have recently been recognized as setting the foundation for best practices in competency evaluation. This training program provides a strong foundation for any mental health professional involved in or wishing to become involved in the evaluation of adjudicative competence.
This training program covers the legal foundations for adjudicative competence, including new developments in the conceptualization of the Dusky standard, as well as practical and theoretical issues in competency evaluation. Competency assessment instruments are reviewed in depth as are report writing and expert testimony. The trainee is taken through the foundations for competency evaluation, the specific abilities to be evaluated, how to formulate a case conceptualization and ultimate opinion regarding a defendant’s adjudicative competence, how to communicate opinions about competence in the written report and through expert testimony.
Upon completion of this course you will be able to:
Describe important legal cases that deal with issues relevant to the interpretation adjudicative competence standards and statutes
Describe the developments in the conceptualization of the Dusky Standard
Describe the research on evaluations of adjudicative competence
Describe theoretical issues in competency evaluation
Describe the most recent clinical guidance on competency evaluation & best practices model
Describe the administration procedures for various competency assessment instruments
Describe the psychometric properties of CAIs
Describe the process for case and opinion formulation
Describe the process of communicating opinions regarding criminal competence
Describe required, appropriate, and inappropriate report contents &
This is a badge-earning course, which means it will help you earn a certificate that can be showcased on digital platforms like LinkedIn.
Review Before Proceeding
Lesson 1 Video
Heilburn & LaDuke 2015
Lesson 2 Video
Lesson 2 Quiz
Lesson 3 Video
The Legal Context
AAPL-CST Guidelines
Lesson 3 Quiz
Lesson 4 Video
Forensic Mental Health Concepts
Attorney CST Questionnaire
Philipsborn (2004)
Lesson 4 Quiz
Lesson 5 Video
Empirical Foundations and Limits
Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview Manual
Pirelli, Gottdeiner & Zapf (2011)
Lesson 5 Quiz
Custom training options for groups of 5 to 500+