AAFP: Advanced Topics in the Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial - Part 2: Neurocognitive Complications, Testing Considerations, and Data Caveats
Presented by: Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP and Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP
3 Hours / 3 CEs
On Demand | Self-Paced Professional Training
This on-demand professional training program on Advanced Topics in the Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial - Part 2: Neurocognitive Complications, Testing Considerations, and Data Caveats is presented by Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP, and Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP, in partnership with the American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP).
This is Part 2 of a three-part workshop series that focuses on more nuanced topics and issues that arise in evaluations of competence to stand trial in adults. Symptoms (and signs) of various neurocognitive disorders are presented, and their impact on competency-related capacities is discussed. Careful selection of appropriate – i.e., relevant, useful, necessary – psychological and forensic assessment instruments is covered, including those situations in which testing may be unnecessary or unwarranted. Situations in which continuous clinical data must be mapped to dichotomous legal criteria are discussed in terms of how to best apply caveats and recommend accommodations for the court’s benefit. Case examples are used throughout to illustrate the concepts and encourage discussion among participants.
Participants are strongly encouraged to participate in the Part 1 training before registering for this event. Full event details can be found here.
This is not an introductory workshop series on competency assessment. The target audience includes forensic mental health professionals at any stage in their career, provided they have some basic understanding of the fundamentals of competency assessment.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:
- 1 Describe signs of possible neurocognitive problems that impact functional legal capacities related to competency to stand trial
- 2 Describe specific circumstances when psychological testing may be relevant/useful in addressing a particular question related to a CST evaluation, including situations in which such may be unnecessary
- 3 Describe situations in which evaluation results should be caveated and accommodations recommended for the court’s benefit
Presented By
Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP Senior Forensic Psychologist at the Netcare Forensic Center
Terry Kukor, Ph.D., ABPP, is board-certified in forensic psychology, and is a Senior Forensic Psychologist at the Netcare Forensic Center. Dr. Kukor has specialized in criminal forensic evaluation for more than 30 years, during which time he has also done violence risk and threat assessment. He teaches multiple workshops for the American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP) including Critical Thinking in Forensic Evaluation. He is a threat assessment consultant for Work Trauma Services Inc., and consults with a regional office of the FBI. In 2016, he was recognized with the Howard H. Sokolov Forensic Mental Health Leadership Award, presented by the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. In 2019, he was granted the Distinguished Contributions to Forensic Psychology Award by AAFP.
Presented By
Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP Psychologist at Whiting Forensic Hospital
Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP, is a board-certified forensic psychologist employed at Whiting Forensic Hospital in Middletown, Connecticut. There, she oversees the competency restoration service and conducts forensic evaluations – competency, as well as general and sexual violence risk management – for the hospital. She is the Practice Sample Review Chair for the American Board of Forensic Psychology, is the Treasurer for the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, and previously represented Forensic Psychology on the Council of Specialties in Professional Psychology. Dr. Hauser also provides training and consultative services, both nationally and internationally, to practitioners and investigators in the areas of interviewing and credibility assessment, risk / threat assessment, and cognitive bias, as well as competency evaluation and restoration.
We are proud to partner with
American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP)
We are proud to partner with the American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP) for this training. AAFP is a non-profit organization of board-certified forensic psychologists whose mission is to contribute to the development and maintenance of forensic psychology as a specialized field of study, research, and practice. The Academy does this by providing high-quality continuing education workshops, providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information among its members, and conferring awards upon outstanding students and practitioners in the field of forensic psychology.
CE Sponsorship Information
Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here.
American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.
Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.
Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.
National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).
Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356 and the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6811. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. CONCEPT Professional Training, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. CONCEPT Professional Training maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period: 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits.