3 Hours / 3 CEs

On Demand | Self-Paced Professional Training

This on-demand professional training program on the Advanced Topics in the Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial - Part 3: Complications, Predicting Restoration, and Report Writing is presented by Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP, and Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP, in partnership with the American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP).

This training is part 3 of the three-part series on Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial. This training  continues to focus on factors that are seldom addressed in training on competency assessments. Assessments of competency can be complicated by issues such as the shelf-life or qualified nature of our competency opinions, differentiating ability from capacity (and both from willingness ), and other unique presenting factors (e.g., amnesia, substance use, language/culture, etc.) or specific questions (e.g., waiving various rights). 

When opining that an examinee is incompetent, courts typically expect an opinion about restorability. To this end, we emphasize the acquisition and careful consideration of data points most relevant to the restoration issue. Lastly, efficient and effective report-writing is discussed, emphasizing a model that maximizes objectivity as well as data relevance and necessity.

Participants are strongly encouraged to complete Part 1 and Part 2 training before registering for this training. Register for both programs below. 

  1. Advanced Topics in Competency Assessment Part 1: Mapping Clinical Data to Functional Legal Capacities
  2. Advanced Topics in the Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial - Part 2: Neurocognitive Complications, Testing Considerations, and Data Caveats


This is not an introductory training on competency assessment. The target audience includes forensic mental health professionals at any stage in their career, provided they have some basic understanding of the fundamentals of competency assessment.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this training, participants will be able to:

  • 1 Describe at least three complicating factors – and possible remedies – in competency assessments
  • 2 Describe three factors that best predict the likelihood of restoration
  • 3 Describe report-writing strategies that maximize objectivity, data relevance, and necessity

Training Instructors:

Terry Kukor, PhD, ABPP

Terry Kukor, Ph.D., ABPP, is board certified in forensic psychology by the American Board of Professional Psychology. In late 2023 he retired from his salaried position at the Netcare Forensic Center in Columbus, Ohio, where he had held a variety of roles including Director of Forensic Services, Senior Forensic Psychologist, and Training Director for the Postdoctoral Fellowship in Forensic Psychology. He is now in independent practice.

Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP

Lori L. Hauser, PhD, ABPP, is a board-certified forensic psychologist employed at Whiting Forensic Hospital in Middletown, Connecticut. There, she oversees the competency restoration service and conducts forensic evaluations – competency, as well as general and sexual violence risk management – for the hospital.

  • Intended Audience

    This training is designed for forensic mental health professionals who already possess a basic understanding of the fundamentals of competency assessment. It is intended to build upon foundational knowledge and is not an introductory course.


    Examples of Relevant Professionals:
    • Mental Health Professionals
    • Forensic Psychologists
    • Forensic Psychiatrists
    • Licensed Clinical Social Workers involved in forensic evaluations
    • Psychiatrists conducting court-ordered assessments
    • Psychologists specializing in forensic or legal contexts
  • Experience Level

    This is Part 3 of a three-part series and is not introductory; participants should already have a basic foundation in competency-to-stand-trial (CST) assessment fundamentals (completion of Parts 1 and 2 is strongly encouraged).


    • Beginner: Pre-licensed or newly licensed clinicians with foundational CST knowledge (e.g., basic legal capacities, common data sources, and standard interview structure) who are ready to learn how to address seldom-taught complications (e.g., amnesia, substance use, language/culture), think about restorability, and improve objectivity in report writing.

    • Intermediate: Licensed clinicians who have conducted CST evaluations and want to refine clinical-to-legal reasoning around qualified/shelf-life opinions, ability vs. capacity vs. willingness, restorability data points, and efficient report-writing strategies that prioritize relevance and necessity.

    • Advanced: Experienced forensic evaluators seeking to deepen nuance in complex CST presentations (e.g., neurocognitive and cultural/linguistic considerations, rights waivers, atypical competency questions), strengthen defensible restorability opinions, and further optimize report structure for maximal objectivity and minimal speculation.
  • Practice Setting

    Practitioners work at the intersection of behavioral health and the legal system, conducting court-related evaluations of competency to stand trial and formulating opinions on restorability. They operate in secure and community-based settings, navigating complex clinical-legal factors and producing objective, legally relevant reports.


    Examples of Practice Settings:
    • Criminal courts and competency dockets
    • Forensic inpatient/state hospitals
    • Jails, prisons, and detention centers
    • Outpatient forensic evaluation clinics and restoration programs
    • Community mental health centers serving court-referred clients
    • Private practices providing court-ordered assessments
    • Government forensic services within state or county agencies
We are proud to partner with

American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP)

American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP)

We are proud to partner with the American Academy of Forensic Psychology (AAFP) for this training. AAFP is a non-profit organization of board-certified forensic psychologists whose mission is to contribute to the development and maintenance of forensic psychology as a specialized field of study, research, and practice. The Academy does this by providing high-quality continuing education workshops, providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information among its members, and conferring awards upon outstanding students and practitioners in the field of forensic psychology.


CE Sponsorship Information

Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by, recognized by, or maintains sponsorship provider status with the following boards and agencies. We maintain responsibility for all content in our CE/CPD programs. For more information, visit here. 

  1. American Psychological Association (APA): Approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists.

  2. Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB): Approved continuing education provider (ACE program, Provider #1480), 11/22/2023–11/22/2026.

  3. Canadian Psychological Association (CPA): Approved to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.

  4. National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): Approved Continuing Education Provider (ACEP No. 7190).


Sponsorship Approval Statements

Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is approved by the Canadian Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 7190. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. Palo Alto University, #1480, is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved as ACE providers. State and provincial regulatory boards have the final authority to determine whether an individual course may be accepted for continuing education credit. Palo Alto University maintains responsibility for this course. ACE provider approval period 11/22/23-11/22/26. Social workers completing this course receive (clinical or social work ethics) continuing education credits. Continuing and Professional Studies, Palo Alto University, is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0103. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies (CONCEPT) is solely responsible for all aspects of the programs. Palo Alto University, Continuing & Professional Studies (CONCEPT), is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0356. Palo Alto University, Continuing and Professional Studies, is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0073.